Disciplinary Reporter Case Digest
| Attorney ID | 0 |
|---|---|
| Attorney Name | Anonymous, |
| DBP Docket No. | None |
| Supreme Court Docket No. | |
| County | |
| Disciplinary Counsel | Samule D. Miller, III |
| Counsel for Respondent | James C. Schwartzman |
| Decision Date | 2004-02-25 |
| Effective Date | 2004-02-25 |
| Case Digest | Respondent violated the New Jersey bona fide office rule for the second time and was suspended from practice in New Jersey for three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated June 20, 2003. He had received a reprimand in New Jersey in 2000 for the same misconduct. In a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania declined by order dated February 25, 2004, to impose reciprocal discipline |
| Rule Violation(s) | None |
| Discipline Imposed | None -- dismissed. |
| Points of Law | Discipline imposed in New Jersey for violations of the New Jersey bona fide office rule will not result in reciprocal discipline in Pennsylvania.. |
| Report/Opinion | not available |