| Case Digest |
Respondent was charged with a lack of diligence in representing a client, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, for failure to pursue a client's legal matter, resulting in the client's action being barred by the Statute of Limitations. The Hearing Committee determined that, in this case, the matter involved solely a mistake on the Respondent's part, and not a lack of diligence. The Board adopted the Hearing Committee's recommendation, and dismissed the Petition for Discipline. |
