| Case Digest |
Respondent was suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated March 21, 2006 for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return client file), and RPC 8.1(d) (failure to cooperate in disciplinary investigation). The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania directed Respondent to inform it why the imposition of identical or comparable discipline would be unwarranted. Respondent did not file a response. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ordered that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Pennsylvania for a period of six months. |
